Test Your Knowledge
Key Takeaways
- The 2026 edition ranks the list using practitioner votes weighed against real incident records: eight of the ten categories moved position
- Prompt injection (LLM01) holds the top spot, so treat all user input to LLMs as untrusted
- Sensitive information disclosure (LLM02) stays at number two: LLMs can leak training data, context, and PII
- Excessive agency jumped from sixth to third (LLM03) as both the practitioner vote and the incident record pointed to agentic deployments
- System Prompt Leakage was broadened and renamed Hidden Context Exposure (LLM08): it now covers any hidden, non-user-facing instructions or operational context placed in a model's context, not only the system prompt
- Improper Output Handling fell from fifth to tenth (LLM10), but the severity of what it causes (XSS, SSRF, RCE) has not changed
- Maintain an AI Bill of Materials (AI-BOM) to track models, datasets, and plugins in your supply chain
Securing LLM-Powered Applications
Large Language Models are being integrated into applications at an unprecedented rate, from chatbots and code assistants to autonomous agents. The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2026 edition, published in August 2026) identifies the most critical security risks unique to these systems. Unlike traditional web vulnerabilities, LLM risks stem from the probabilistic nature of model outputs, the opacity of training data, and the novel ways users interact with AI systems.
The biggest moves: Excessive Agency climbed from sixth to third and Unbounded Consumption rose four places, while Improper Output Handling fell furthest, from fifth to tenth. Misinformation rose two places after the incident data ranked it far higher than practitioners did.
Each of the ten categories below has its own detailed page with risk ratings, real-world attack examples, and practical mitigations. Click through from the summary grid.
What Changed From the 2025 Edition
All ten 2025 risk areas survive into 2026, but the ordering was rebuilt using incident data alongside expert judgment, and one category was significantly broadened.
| 2026 | Category | Was in 2025 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLM01 | Prompt Injection | LLM01 | No change |
| LLM02 | Sensitive Information Disclosure | LLM02 | No change |
| LLM03 | Excessive Agency | LLM06 | Up 3 |
| LLM04 | Supply Chain | LLM03 | Down 1 |
| LLM05 | Data and Model Poisoning | LLM04 | Down 1 |
| LLM06 | Unbounded Consumption | LLM10 | Up 4 |
| LLM07 | Misinformation | LLM09 | Up 2 |
| LLM08 | Hidden Context Exposure | LLM07 (System Prompt Leakage) | Renamed and broadened |
| LLM09 | Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | LLM08 | Down 1 |
| LLM10 | Improper Output Handling | LLM05 | Down 5 |
If you built a control mapping or training deck against the 2025 numbering, the renumbering matters more than the content: LLM05 no longer means Improper Output Handling, and LLM06 no longer means Excessive Agency.
OWASP LLM Top 10 (2026) Summary
| ID | Category | Risk | Primary Defense |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLM01 | Prompt Injection | Critical | Input filtering, privilege separation, human-in-the-loop |
| LLM02 | Sensitive Info Disclosure | Critical | PII scrubbing, output filtering, access controls |
| LLM03 | Excessive Agency | Critical | Minimal functions, read-only defaults, human gates |
| LLM04 | Supply Chain | High | AI-BOM, hash verification, trusted sources |
| LLM05 | Data and Model Poisoning | High | Data provenance, sanitization, anomaly detection |
| LLM06 | Unbounded Consumption | High | Rate limiting, token caps, cost alerting |
| LLM07 | Misinformation | Medium | RAG grounding, fact-checking, human review |
| LLM08 | Hidden Context Exposure | High | No secrets in context, per-user RAG authz, minimal tool schemas |
| LLM09 | Vector & Embedding Weaknesses | High | Access controls, input validation, metadata filtering |
| LLM10 | Improper Output Handling | Critical | Output encoding, CSP, never trust LLM output |
Explore More AI Security Guides
For comprehensive tutorials and security guides:
Visit FixTheVuln.com →Related Resources
FixTheVuln Store
Study Planners Available for Both Certs
Fillable PDF study planners with domain trackers, weekly schedules, and progress tracking. Available in Standard, ADHD-Friendly, Dark Mode, and 4-Format Bundle.
CompTIA Security+ Planner EC-Council CEH Planner60+ certifications available, from $5.99
FixTheVuln Store
Patch Tuesday Sprint Kit
5 fillable templates for vulnerability triage, sprint planning, testing, SLA tracking, and executive reporting. Free blank templates or $4.99/mo for pre-filled intelligence with real CISA KEV data.
Try Free Templates Subscribe ($4.99/mo)CyberFolio
Choosing your next cert? Track them all in one place.
Build a free, shareable cybersecurity portfolio that highlights your certifications, projects, and skills.
Build Your Portfolio →